When it comes to the writing of the United States Constitution, one controversial topic that often arises is the issue of slavery. The question of whether or not the Constitution supported or condoned slavery has been a subject of debate for years, with many conflicting opinions and interpretations. So, which is most true about agreements over slavery in the writing of the Constitution?

It is true that slavery was a significant issue during the writing of the Constitution. Many of the Founding Fathers were slaveowners themselves, and the institution of slavery was deeply ingrained in the American economy and culture at the time. However, the Constitution itself does not explicitly mention slavery. It was mentioned only indirectly, most notably in the infamous “Three-Fifths Compromise.”

Under this compromise, slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of determining a state’s population size and, as a result, its representation in Congress. This agreement was necessary to gain the support of Southern states, who had a significant population of enslaved individuals but would have had less representation if slaves were not counted at all.

However, it is also true that many of the Founding Fathers expressed opposition to slavery and recognized its immorality. Thomas Jefferson, for example, wrote in his original draft of the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal” and that they are entitled to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” While Jefferson himself was a slaveowner, this sentiment reflected a growing belief among many Americans that slavery was at odds with the principles of liberty and democracy.

Ultimately, the Constitution did not do much to address the issue of slavery, and it would take several more decades of struggle and conflict before it was abolished. However, the Constitution’s lack of explicit support for slavery, as well as the abolitionist sentiments expressed by some of its authors, suggest that it was not intended to be a pro-slavery document. Rather, the Constitution was a compromise among many competing interests, and the issue of slavery was just one of many complicated factors in its creation.

In conclusion, while it is true that slavery was an important issue during the writing of the Constitution, its treatment in the document was indirect and controversial. The Three-Fifths Compromise and other compromises made to appease Southern states reflected the difficult political realities of the time, but the Constitution’s lack of explicit support for slavery and the opposition to it expressed by some of its authors suggest that it was not intended to be a pro-slavery document.